Start with heat transfer meters and cooperative invoices. It is the source used to decide how the cooperative credits a household when the shared line warms unevenly; it is not the decision itself. The rule only works if the source describes conditions at the shared heat line at Ember Court.
Known: the current file counts 67 hours a shared line stays within its promised range, compared with 65 in the prior window. The committee records a decision and the reason on the public board. The entries have dates and a named clerk.
Disputed: The operator measures total heat sent. Residents ask for a reading at each branch before credits are calculated. One side emphasizes the posted total; the other points to one branch warms a workshop before it reaches the upper apartments.
Why it matters: the decision determines which residents can rely on the service and which staff must carry out the change. The file does not settle that by itself.
Next: The board recorded the outcome that it approved a paid-time trial with a closeout date.
