A review of air sample locations, vent fan hours and ward complaint cards finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the westward vent corridor. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: one sample point sits below the fan outlet while the public board uses the upper reading.
The air sample locations, vent fan hours and ward complaint cards lists 38 samples with a location and a fan setting attached; the previous window lists 42. Nazza Wire checked both against public notices checked against the copies households actually received. The source was checked against a second copy held by Vela Orr. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The operator relies on the upper monitor. Residents ask for a sample from the corridor where they work and sleep. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how to compare air measurements taken on different sides of a vent outlet.
The clerk closes this docket and assigns the next window a fresh scope. The board closed this docket after it approved a paid-time trial with a closeout date. The next window starts with a fresh record.
