A review of block origin tags, yard receipts and the reuse test cards finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the reclaimed material row at South Stack. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: blocks from two cooling runs have different edge strength.
The block origin tags, yard receipts and the reuse test cards lists 22 blocks with a source and test result on the same tag; the previous window lists 21. Orrik Smelt checked both against contract clauses set beside paid invoices and the work completed. The source was checked against a second copy held by Pera Cinder. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The yard groups blocks by size. Masons want the cooling run and test result visible before purchase. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how buyers identify a suitable block without discarding useful material.
Atime-limited trial begins under a dated card visible to the crew. The Year fourth, rain shift window 2 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The cooperative will trial a source tag on each cooling run.
